Peter Jones writes:
> > > That doesn't follow. Comutationalists don't
> > > have to believe any old programme is conscious.
> > > It might be the case that only an indeterministic
> > > one will do. A deterministic programme could
> > > be exposed as a programme in a Turing Test.
> > Then you're saying something strange and non-physical happens to explain
> > why a program is conscious on the first run when it passes the Turing test
> > but not on the second run when it deterministically repeats all the
> > physical states
> > of the first run in response to a recording of your keystrokes from the
> > first run.
> It was never conscious, and if anyonw concludede it was on
> the first run, they were mistaken. The TT is a rule-of-thumb for
> it does not magically endow consciousness.
Are you suggesting that of two very similar programs, one containing a true
number generator and the other a pseudorandom number generator, only the former
could possibly be conscious? I suppose it is possible, but I see no reason to
that it is true.
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at