Russell Standish wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 01:57:07PM -0700, Brent Meeker wrote:
>>>What are the ingredients of a conscious computer ? Perhaps
>>>one essential component is a central processing unit that depends on quantum
>>>randomness to arrive at a decision when other factors balance out.
>>I don't think there's any reason to suppoose quantum randomness plays a role
>>consciousness - and there are some reasons to think it doesn't, e.g. see
>>paper. There is plenty of environmental "noise" to prevent Buridan's ass
> Tegmark's paper looked specifically at quantum computing as a model
> for consciousness (ie Penrose's suggestion), and the requirements of
> quantum coherent states. He didn't look at quantum noise effects.
> There is evidence in the form of brains being structured to behave
> chaotically (in the classical deterministic chaos sense) (see Walter
> Freeman's work). This has the effect of amplifying randomness at the
> molecular (thermal) level, which ultimately depends on quantum
> randomness, to the macroscopic brain level.
> This may be coincidental, but I think not. Your PC is engineered to
> avoid the effects of chaos to prevent this very thing occurring. Why
> wouldn't nature do the same thing unless it were deliberately trying
> to exploit randomness?
In nature there's no reason to depend on amplifying quantum randomness -
plenty of "random" environmental input to keep our brains from getting stuck in
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at