Bruno Marchal wrote in explaining Maudlin's argument:"For any given precise running computation associated to some inner experience, youI believe the argument is erroneous. Maudlin's argument reminds me of the fallacy in Maxwell's demon. To reduce the machine's complexity Maudlin must perform a modicum of analysis, simulation etc.. to predict how the machine performs in different situations. Using his newly acquired knowledge, he then maximally reduces the machine's complexity for one particular task, keeping the machine fully operational for all other tasks. In effect Maudlin has surreptitiously inserted himself in the mechanism. so now, we don't have just the machine but we have the machine plus Maudlin. The machine is not simpler or not existent. The machine is now Maudlin! In conclusion, the following conclusion reached by Maudlin and Bruno is fallacious. "Now this shows that any inner experience can be associated with an arbitrary low (even null) physicalMaudlin's argument cannot be used to state that "any inner experience can be associated with an arbitrary low (even null) physical activity." Thus it is not necessarily true that comp and materialism are incompatible. I think the paradox can be resolved by tracing how information flows and Maudlin is certainly in the circuit, using information, just like Maxwell's demon is affecting entropy. George --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
- Re: Barbour's mistake: An alternative to a timless P... marc . geddes
- Re: Barbour's mistake: An alternative to a timle... jamikes
- Re: Barbour's mistake: An alternative to a timle... Bruno Marchal
- Hypostasis Russell Standish
- Re: Hypostasis Bruno Marchal
- Re: Barbour- Platonia in private! jamikes
- Re: Barbour's mistake: An alternative to a t... jamikes
- Re: Barbour's mistake: An alternative to... Bruno Marchal
- Re: Barbour's mistake: An alternative to a timless Platon... David Nyman
- Maudlin's argument George Levy
- Re: Maudlin's argument Bruno Marchal
- Re: Maudlin's Demon (Argument) George Levy
- Re: Maudlin's Demon (Argument) Bruno Marchal
- Re: Maudlin's Demon (Argument) George Levy
- Re: Maudlin's Demon (Argument) George Levy
- Re: Maudlin's Demon (Argument) Russell Standish
- Re: Maudlin's Demon (Argument) David Nyman
- Re: Maudlin's Demon (Argument) Brent Meeker
- Re: Maudlin's Demon (Argument) Bruno Marchal
- Re: Maudlin's Demon (Argument) David Nyman

