Bruno Marchal wrote: > ... > If not, let us just say that your ultrafinitist hypothesis is too > strong to make it coherent with the computationalist hypo. It means > that you have a theory which is just different from what I propose. > And then I will ask you to be "ultra-patient", for I prefer to > continue my explanation, and to come back on the discussion on > hypotheses after. OK. > > Actually, my conversation with Tom was interrupted by Norman who fears > people leaving the list when matter get too much technical; Pay no attention to Norman. :-)
I attend to this list because I learn things from it and I learn a lot from your technical presentations. I'm also doubtful of infinities, but they make things simpler; so my attitude is, let's see where the theory takes us. Brent Meeker --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
