Le 21-févr.-08, à 15:01, Lennart Nilsson a écrit :
> Oh, I am very much proEverett and proDeutsch and, I might add > proStandish > (having translated his book Theory of Nothing into swedish). And you > are > right of course, it was your assumptions I questioned... OK, and I said : "No problem then", because (as a logician perhaps) I seldomly discuss assumptions. But still, although I agree with Mirek that comp (as I define it, i.e. CT + "yes doctor") is a very strong hypothesis, the negation of it is also quite strong, if not stronger. For believing in non-comp, you have to believe in actual physical infinities and/or in genuine third person indeterminacy (like copenhagen and anti-everettist). You could perhaps elaborate abit, if you have the time. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
