Le 21-févr.-08, à 15:01, Lennart Nilsson a écrit :

> Oh, I am very much proEverett and proDeutsch and, I might add 
> proStandish
> (having translated his book Theory of Nothing into swedish). And you 
> are
> right of course, it was your assumptions I questioned...

OK, and I said : "No problem then", because (as a logician perhaps) I 
seldomly discuss assumptions.

But still, although I agree with Mirek that comp (as I define it, i.e. 
CT + "yes doctor") is a very strong hypothesis, the negation of it is 
also quite strong, if not stronger. For believing in non-comp, you have 
to believe in actual physical infinities and/or in genuine third person 
indeterminacy (like copenhagen and anti-everettist). You could perhaps 
elaborate abit, if you have the time.



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to