Hi Russell:

In response to Jason you wrote:

>An OM is a state of a machine. In as far as the machine is embedded
>in space, the the OM is spread across space. Successive OMs involve
>state change,

In my model a universe is an incomplete entity [a Something or a Nothing]
within the Everything [the ALL(s) + the Nothing(s)[nesting provides the
multiplicity]] that is driven towards completeness by un-resolvable
meaningful [to that entities current state] questions that require
resolution. I suppose this constitutes a "machine".

I wonder if these conclusions - [machines/dynamics] - indeed impose the
property of having space like aspects on the Everything in addition to time
like aspects? Further - would that in turn give it a wider "physical"

>ie must differ by at least a bit. Therefore, OMs must
>also be extended in time by some finite amount, rather than be of
>infinitesimal direction. 

I agree.

>Of course this finite amount of time will be
>observer dependent,

How do you mean that. I do not see that state dwell duration differs within
a given universe.  I also do not see a fixed value even for a particular

Hal Ruhl

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to