Hi Russell: In response to Jason you wrote:
>An OM is a state of a machine. In as far as the machine is embedded >in space, the the OM is spread across space. Successive OMs involve >state change, In my model a universe is an incomplete entity [a Something or a Nothing] within the Everything [the ALL(s) + the Nothing(s)[nesting provides the multiplicity]] that is driven towards completeness by un-resolvable meaningful [to that entities current state] questions that require resolution. I suppose this constitutes a "machine". I wonder if these conclusions - [machines/dynamics] - indeed impose the property of having space like aspects on the Everything in addition to time like aspects? Further - would that in turn give it a wider "physical" matrix? >ie must differ by at least a bit. Therefore, OMs must >also be extended in time by some finite amount, rather than be of >infinitesimal direction. I agree. >Of course this finite amount of time will be >observer dependent, How do you mean that. I do not see that state dwell duration differs within a given universe. I also do not see a fixed value even for a particular universe. Hal Ruhl --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
