Hi Russell:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 09:35:47PM -0500, Hal Ruhl wrote: >> >> Hi Russell: >> >> In response to Jason you wrote: >> >>>An OM is a state of a machine. In as far as the machine is embedded >>>in space, the the OM is spread across space. Successive OMs involve >>>state change, > >>In my model a universe is an incomplete entity [a Something or a Nothing] >>within the Everything [the ALL(s) + the Nothing(s)[nesting provides the >>multiplicity]] that is driven towards completeness by un-resolvable >>meaningful [to that entities current state] questions that require >>resolution. I suppose this constitutes a "machine". > >>I wonder if these conclusions - [machines/dynamics] - indeed impose the >>property of having space like aspects on the Everything in addition to time >>like aspects? Further - would that in turn give it a wider "physical" >>matrix? > >Its not obvious to me. What is your reasoning? As I understand your Theory of Nothing book the "Everything" in it has or at least contains time like components [time postulate]. I agree but apparently for a different reason. In your reply to Jason you allowed that the OM "machine" [our "machines" also apparently differ] could have an extent in space as well. This seems to require the Everything to have space like aspects. Actually if it contains one dimension in a real sense to avoid selection it should contain more. If it has time and space aspects what prevents it from having material aspects? Until now I had felt that the Everything did not require space or material aspects but I am reconsidering the possibility. > >>>Of course this finite amount of time will be >>>observer dependent, > >>How do you mean that. I do not see that state dwell duration differs within >>a given universe. I also do not see a fixed value even for a particular >>universe. >Sounds like you're having a bob each way here... As I understand your response to Jason you allow two different observers [a fly and a human] in the same universe to have different OM durations and I do not see this. Perhaps I do not understand your response. Did you intend to have them in the same universe? Yours Hal Ruhl -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A/Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Mathematics UNSW SYDNEY 2052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australia http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
