A representation of a thing (say MGA) is as good (ie as authentic) as the thing being represented.
Yes? Autrement dit: there is no especial difference between the movie and the subject (of the movie) - where the movie is a more or less "complete" (whatever that means) representation of the subject I have always FELT this to be true Guys, There is a great need to SIMPLIFY all this stuff for dummies like me Somebody please write "The Dummie's Guide to the Computationalist Hypothesis" You stand to make beaucoup de fric K --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
