On Apr 26, 2:01 pm, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not sure that the measure problem can be so easily > abandoned/ignored. Assuming every Observer Moment had has an equal > measure, then the random/white-noise filled OMs should vastly > outnumber the ordered and sensible OMs.
The ordered and sensible OM's may be vastly outnumbered, but they are there. And thus if you assume that everything happens, they will happen, and that explains your current experience of an ordered and sensible reality. I don't see the problem. Again, I'm lead to this conclusion by the line of reasoning mentioned in my previous posts. I didn't start with this assumption and then try to come up with supporting evidence. It is a strange conclusion, but it seems to me that any theory that explains conscious experience is going to have to be strange. I think this one is only slightly odder than Bruno's. And it's not really much odder than MWI, or the implications of an infinite universe (e.g., infinite Kellys), or of infinite time (e.g., poincare recurrence, boltzmann brains). Or strange compared to thinking about where a material universe could have come from, what proceeded it, what caused it, what underlies it, etc. That we exist at all is pretty strange I think. > Though I ever only have one > OM to go by, the fact I was able to maintain a > non-random/non-white-noise filled OMs long enough to compose this post > should serve as some level of evidence that all OMs are not weighted > equally. If all possible OMs are real, then you will have successfully completed all possible posts. So, where's the problem? You are one of the Jason's who successfully completed a post. Where does your experience depart from what the theory predicts? You can only experience one path through life. One reality per customer. The reality that you are experiencing HAD to be experienced by someone, this is mandatory in my theory. Using the fact that you ARE in fact experiencing it to try to disprove my theory I think is not a valid option. My theory does make one definite prediction, and so is (first person) falsifiable. It predicts that there is always a next moment. Always another conscious experience. So, if you die and that's it, just oblivion...then I was wrong. Oops. So, we just have to wait...we will have our answer soon enough! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---