On May 5, 1:27 am, Kim Jones <kimjo...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> On 04/05/2009, at 12:57 PM, daddycay...@msn.com wrote:
>
> > But doesn't it make sense that if God were personal, and a human
> > person like us could relate to him/her as a person, then that would
> > result in expanding our consciousness?
>
> > Tom
>
> What particular (and verifiable) personal interactions with God would  
> you be able to claim Tom?
>

If you look at what I wrote, I am not claiming anything.

> Many people make this stupefying claim from time to time, but none  
> have ever been independently verified to my knowledge.
>
> But then I guess it would no longer be "personal". That's the trouble  
> with "experiences of God". Being so personal, you can only wait for  
> your own personal experience to turn up. What if it doesn't?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kim Jones

If you look at what I wrote, I am simply asking about two logical
implications.

The first question is in the form of, "Does A imply B?":

> I agree that religion, and a lot of other stuff, produces a lot of  fake
> Not good.  So that implies that atheism is the way to go?

The second question is in the form of, "Doesn't C imply D?":

> But doesn't it make sense that if God were personal, and a human
> person like us could relate to him/her as a person, then that would
> result in expanding our consciousness?

Tom

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to