On May 5, 1:27 am, Kim Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/05/2009, at 12:57 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > But doesn't it make sense that if God were personal, and a human > > person like us could relate to him/her as a person, then that would > > result in expanding our consciousness? > > > Tom > > What particular (and verifiable) personal interactions with God would > you be able to claim Tom? >
If you look at what I wrote, I am not claiming anything. > Many people make this stupefying claim from time to time, but none > have ever been independently verified to my knowledge. > > But then I guess it would no longer be "personal". That's the trouble > with "experiences of God". Being so personal, you can only wait for > your own personal experience to turn up. What if it doesn't? > > Best regards, > > Kim Jones If you look at what I wrote, I am simply asking about two logical implications. The first question is in the form of, "Does A imply B?": > I agree that religion, and a lot of other stuff, produces a lot of fake > Not good. So that implies that atheism is the way to go? The second question is in the form of, "Doesn't C imply D?": > But doesn't it make sense that if God were personal, and a human > person like us could relate to him/her as a person, then that would > result in expanding our consciousness? Tom --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
