On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote: > This argument is not > definitive mainly because we don't have a definitive theory of > consciousness, but to the extent we assume a physical basis for > consciousness it seems pretty good.
Ha! As long as you assume there is no problem of consciousness, then there's no problem! That is pretty good. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
