On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> This argument is not
> definitive mainly because we don't have a definitive theory of
> consciousness, but to the extent we assume a physical basis for
> consciousness it seems pretty good.
Ha! As long as you assume there is no problem of consciousness, then
there's no problem! That is pretty good.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at