On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> This argument is not
> definitive mainly because we don't have a definitive theory of
> consciousness, but to the extent we assume a physical basis for
> consciousness it seems pretty good.

Ha!  As long as you assume there is no problem of consciousness, then
there's no problem!  That is pretty good.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to