Hmmm. Interesting. Part 2 made it, but not part one. Part 1:
> You never think about how to test and potentially falsify your theories do > you. Which makes these discussions fruitless. > > Brent Did you stop reading there??? It got better! Especially once I got past the Cooper quotes. So I'm not arguing against the Standard Model, of which I take an instrumentalist view. Rather, I'm arguing against the metaphysical position known as Physicalism. Is physicalism falsifiable? I seem to recall that you believe that an external indeterministic physical world exists independently of your observations, where events transpire according to some kind of necessity. Yes? No? But, this belief isn't entailed by methodological naturalism. It's a leap of faith. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
