You should get work helping Rachel collect material. You'd be a natural.    m


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bruno Marchal 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 4:39 AM
  Subject: Re: bruno list




  On 14 Jul 2011, at 14:39, Craig Weinberg wrote:


    I don't want to talk about inner experience. I want to talk about my 
fundamental reordering of the cosmos, which if it were correct, would be 
staggeringly important and I have not seen anywhere else:

      1.. Mind and body are not merely separate, but perpendicular topologies 
of the same ontological continuum of sense. 
  Could you define "perpendicular topologies"? You say you don't study math, so 
why use mathematical terms (which seems non sensical for a mathematicians, 
unless you do a notion of set of topologies with some scalar products, but then 
you should give it.






      2.. The interior of electromagnetism is sensorimotive, the interior of 
determinism is free will, and the interior of general relativity is perception. 
  What do you mean by interior of electromagnetism.




      3.. Quantum Mechanics is a misinterpretation of atomic quorum sensing.
  This seems like non sense.






      4.. Time, space, and gravity are void. Their effects are explained by 
perceptual relativity and sensorimotor electromagnetism.
  ?




      5.. The "speed of light" c is not a speed it's a condition of nonlocality 
or absolute velocity, representing a third state of physical relation as the 
opposite of both stillness and motion.
  ?






    It's not about meticulous logical deduction, it's about grasping the 
largest, broadest description of the cosmos possible which doesn't leave 
anything out. I just want to see if this map flies, and if not, why not? 




  Anyway, you seem to presuppose some physicalness, and so by the UDA 
reasoning, you need a physics and a cognitive science with (very special) 
infinities. This seems to make the mind body problem (MB), and its formulation, 
artificially more complex, without motivation. Without an attempt to make 
things clearer I can hardly add anything. Perhaps understanding the MB problem 
in the comp context might help you to formulate it in some non-comp context.

  Bruno




  http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/







  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
  To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
  For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to