On Sep 14, 7:18 pm, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 9/14/2011 3:45 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> > To me it seems best to understand the beginning of the universe as the
> > same thing as the end of the universe - a singularity out of which
> > order emerges. Not nothingness but thingness, and more importantly,
> > the experienceness of thingness. That is what needs no explanation
> > because it precedes the division of anything from anything else so
> > there is nothing that is not already explained. Explanation can only
> > be conceived of outside of the singularity where things can perceive
> > some phenomena but not others, so that they want to translate the
> > unknown into their native experience.
>
> There are no singularities in physics - only in the equations; an indication 
> the equation
> no longer applies.

It would make sense that singularity transcends purely physical
description.

Craig

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to