On Sep 14, 7:18 pm, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/14/2011 3:45 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > To me it seems best to understand the beginning of the universe as the > > same thing as the end of the universe - a singularity out of which > > order emerges. Not nothingness but thingness, and more importantly, > > the experienceness of thingness. That is what needs no explanation > > because it precedes the division of anything from anything else so > > there is nothing that is not already explained. Explanation can only > > be conceived of outside of the singularity where things can perceive > > some phenomena but not others, so that they want to translate the > > unknown into their native experience. > > There are no singularities in physics - only in the equations; an indication > the equation > no longer applies.
It would make sense that singularity transcends purely physical description. Craig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
