On 9/21/2011 7:52 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
[SPK]
A tautology might be 'empty' in some sense but it is still meaningful. Meaning obtains from relations between many; absent the universe of relations meaning vanishes. Consider a simple dictionary. each word entry in it is defined by some set of other words in some relation to each other. Consider a dictionary where each different entry had an identical set of words and relations as its definition. What would any word 'mean'?


Consider a dictionary (like real dictionaries) in which every word has a different set of words in its definition. And further suppose that (unlike real dictionaries) if you started at any word and looked up the definition of every word in its definition and then did so recursively you would eventually have looked up every word in the dictionary. Would you know the meaning of any of the words? I'd say you would not until you had an ostensive definition of a sufficient subset of the words.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to