On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 07:02:28PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > OK. But note that in this case you are using the notion of 3-OM (or > computational state), not Bostrom notion of 1-OM (or my notion of > first person state). > The 3-OM are countable, but the 1-OMs are not.
Could you explain more why you think this? AFAICT, Bostrom makes no mention of the cardinality of his OMs. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected] University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
