On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 07:02:28PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> OK. But note that in this case you are using the notion of 3-OM (or
> computational state), not Bostrom notion of 1-OM (or my notion of
> first person state).
> The 3-OM are countable, but the 1-OMs are not.

Could you explain more why you think this? AFAICT, Bostrom makes no
mention of the cardinality of his OMs.


Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Professor of Mathematics      hpco...@hpcoders.com.au
University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to