On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Jan 19, 4:56 am, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> >
> > Yes. Craig argue that machine cannot thinks by pointing on its fridge.
> >
> >
> > > Are you afraid to burn coal in your stove out of concern that the
> > > material will sense being burned?
> >
> > Yes. Craig's "theory" is a bit frightening with respect of this. But
> > of course that is not an argument. Craig might accuse you of wishful
> > thinking.
> >
> This is the same thing you accuse me of. I have never said that coal
> is more alive than silicon, I don't even say that dead organisms are
> more alive than silicon. I only say that to really act *exactly* like
> a living thing, you need to feel like a living thing, and to feel like
> a living thing you actually be a living organism, which seems to
> entail cells made of carbohydrates, amino acids, and water. Carbon,
> Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Nitrogen. Not Silicon or Germanium. Make a
> computer out of carbs, aminos, and water and see what happens to your
> ability to control it as a Turing machine.

Some have argued that cars are alive.  They evolve, consume, move,
reproduce and so on.  While they are dependent on humans for reproduction,
we too depend on a a very specific environment to reproduce.  Much like



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to