Thank you Mr. John Mikes.
My opinion.
Quantum electrodynamics: Who am I ?
=.
In 1904 Lorentz proved: there isn’t em waves without Electron
It means the source of these em waves must be an Electron
The electron and the em waves they are physical reality
Can evolution of consciousness of life begin on electron’s level?
==.
Origin of life is a result of physical laws that govern Universe
Electron takes important part in this work.
#
1900, 1905
Planck and Einstein found the energy of electron: E=h*f.
1916
Sommerfeld found the formula of electron : e^2=ah*c,
it means: e = +ah*c and e = -ah*c.
1928
Dirac found two more formulas of electron’s energy:
+E=Mc^2 and -E=Mc^2.
According to QED in interaction with vacuum electron’s
energy is infinite: E= ∞
Questions.
Why does the simplest particle - electron have six ( 6 ) formulas ?
Why does electron obey five ( 5) Laws ?
a) Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass
b) Maxwell’s equations
c) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law
d) Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law
e) Fermi-Dirac statistics.
Nobody knows.
====.
What is an electron ?
Now nobody knows
In the internet we can read hundreds theories about electron
All of them are problematical.
We can read hundreds books about philosophy of physics.
But how can we trust them if we don’t know what is an electron ?
====.
Quote by Heinrich Hertz on Maxwell's equations:
"One cannot escape the feeling that these mathematical formulae
have an independent existence and an intelligence of their own,
that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than their discoverers,
that we get more out of them than was originally put into them."
====.
Ladies and Gentlemen !
Friends !
The banal Electron is not as simple as we think and, maybe,
he is wiser than we are.
=====.
Once again: Brain and Electron.
Human brain works on two levels:
consciousness and subconsciousness. The neurons of brain
create these two levels. So, that it means consciousness and
subconsciousness from physical point of view ( interaction
between billions and billions neurons and electron).
It can only mean that the state of neurons in these two
situations is different.
How can we understand these different states of neurons?
How does the brain generate consciousness?
We can understand this situation only on the quantum level,
only using Quantum theory. But there isn’t QT without
Quantum of Light and Electron. So, what is interaction between
Quantum of Light, Electron and brain ? Nobody knows.
Therefore I say:
we must understand not only the brain but electron too.
And when we understand the Electron
we will know the Ultimate Nature of Reality.
=================.
Socratus
==.
On Apr 25, 12:09 am, John Mikes <jami...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Socratus, and discussion friends:
> are we so simpletons, indeed? does a flat EM (field?) plus the 'variety' of
> cells constitute a 'person'? does it justify our psychological mistakes? (I
> mention deliberately those, not the regularities, to divert from 'rules we
> know').
> I think (?) a sort of "pattern" functionality (or rather: relations) may be
> needed and as I read in these discussions: nobody feels knowledgeable
> enough to go into that. This is the 'part' we did not (yet???) learn and I
> call it the complexity of a person within the wider complexity of
> everything.
> It is just NOT *THIS AND THAT*.* *
> Would you reduce us into - let us say - a million varieties of cells (OK,
> make it a billion) plus the one and only EM field - even if in a million
> variables of control in interference. I think (in the ongoing theoretical
> views) even the RNA has to be directed into directing the DNA - which still
> may be only one imaginary factor we speak about for a genetic (?)
> ordering.
> And - all this in believing in 'atoms' and a 'physical world'. (And
> photons?)
> As I wrote within my diatribe "Science Religion" in 2003.
>
> I stick to my agnosticism, smile upon my 50+ years "actively and result
> fully" working as a chemist-Ph.D. and a polymer Science D.Sci. with my 38+
> patents and papers, books, and my journal published. Now, past 90 I can
> afford to 'not knowing' about what I was brainwashed into in college
> (1940-44).
> JM
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:59 AM, socra...@bezeqint.net <
>
>
>
> socra...@bezeqint.net> wrote:
> > Cells make copies of themselves.
> > Different cells make different copies of themselves.
> > Cells come in all shapes and sizes.
> > Somehow these different cells are tied between themselves
> > and during pregnancy process of 9 months gradually ( ! )
> > and by chance ( or not by chance ) they change own
> > geometrical form from zygote to a child.
> > Cells come in all shapes and sizes, and then . . . they are you.
> > Cells they are you ( !? )
> > This is modern biomechanical /chemical point of view.
> > #
> > Maybe 99% agree that ‘Cells - they are you .’
> > But this explanation is not complete.
> > Cells have an energy / electrical potential.
> > Cells have an electromagnetic field.
> > Therefore we need to say:
> > ‘ Cells and electromagnetic field - they are you.’
> > ===.
> > Is this formulation correct?
> > Of course it is correct.
> > Why?
> > Because:
> > Bioelectromagnetism (sometimes equated with bioelectricity)
> > refers to the electrical, magnetic or electromagnetic fields
> > produced by living cells, tissues or organisms.
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioelectromagnetism
>
> > What does it mean?
> > It means there isn’t biological cell without electromagnetic fields.
> > It means that in the cell we have two ( 2 ) substances:
> > matter and electromagnetic fields.
> > And in 1985 Richard P. Feynman wrote book:
> > QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter
>
> > The idea of book - the interaction between light
> > ( electromagnetic fields ) and matter is strange.
>
> > He wrote: ‘ The theory of quantum electrodynamics
> > describes Nature as absurd from the point of view
> > of common sense. And it agrees fully with experiment.
> > So I hope you accept Nature as She is — absurd. ‘
> > / page 10. /
> > #
> > Once again:
> > 1.
> > Cells and electromagnetic field - they are you.
> > 2.
> > We cannot understand their interaction and therefore
> > we don’t know the answer to the question: ‘ who am I ?’
> > ===.
> > Socratus.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Everything List" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
