On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:07 AM, John Mikes <[email protected]> wrote: > Stathis wrote (to Craig): > > "But you believe that the neurochemicals do things contrary to what > chemists would predict, for example an ion channel opening or closing > without any cause such as a change in transmembrane potential or > ligand concentration. We've talked about this before and it just isn't > consistent with any scientific evidence. You interpret the existence > "spontaneous neural activity" as meaning that something magical like > this happens, but it doesn't mean that at all." > > Stathis, you know ... whatever we state as 'knowledge about mind etc.' is an > explanation for the little we think we learned - with lots we have no idea > about. > Like: chemicals ... potentials ... scientific evidence ... even cause > (meaning the > part we alredy know about) and mauch much more. > It is your turf, you must know about more we don't know only think we do.
It's your turf too - you're a chemist. -- Stathis Papaioannou -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
