But I don't believe (in?) it - I am agnostic. Nonbeliever.
(SONG: I lost my turf in San Francisco)
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Stathis Papaioannou <stath...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:07 AM, John Mikes <jami...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Stathis wrote (to Craig):
> > "But you believe that the neurochemicals do things contrary to what
> > chemists would predict, for example an ion channel opening or closing
> > without any cause such as a change in transmembrane potential or
> > ligand concentration. We've talked about this before and it just isn't
> > consistent with any scientific evidence. You interpret the existence
> > "spontaneous neural activity" as meaning that something magical like
> > this happens, but it doesn't mean that at all."
> > Stathis, you know ... whatever we state as 'knowledge about mind etc.'
> is an
> > explanation for the little we think we learned - with lots we have no
> > about.
> > Like: chemicals ... potentials ... scientific evidence ... even cause
> > (meaning the
> > part we alredy know about) and mauch much more.
> > It is your turf, you must know about more we don't know only think we do.
> It's your turf too - you're a chemist.
> Stathis Papaioannou
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> For more options, visit this group at
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at