2012/12/17 meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net>
> On 12/17/2012 1:15 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>> ISTM that consistency is the fact that you can't have contradiction.
> In some logics you're allowed to have contradictions, but the rules of
> inference don't permit you to prove everything from a contradiction. I
> think they are then called 'para-consistent'.
Sure, but contrary as what you wrote, consistency is "A consistent theory
is one that does not contain a contradiction" cf:
Incompletness that you can't prove every proposition.
No, incompleteness is you can't prove every true proposition.
That's what I meant.
> Which implies there is some measure of 'true' other than 'provable'.
What do you mean ? that provable true is truer ?
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe@
> **googlegroups.com <everything-list%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at