On 04 Mar 2013, at 02:09, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:00 PM, <spudboy...@aol.com> wrote:
Richard, a very good paper you have there. The Mindspace recording
mechanism
you invoked sounds exactly like the Hindu akashic records feature
to their
religion. For people like myself, you'd need to expand on the
particular
physics of the recording, such as what is analogous to the read-
write head,
and what is analogous to disk memory?
The recording mechanism is a product of computation. The CY particles
in a cubic lattice (BTW they are 1000 planck lengths across according
to Yau) compute everything that could possibly happen anywhere and
anytime.
If MWI is correct, then everything that could happen does happen and
its all written in the Mindspace ahead of and behind time. If SWI is
correct, then everything possible is still written in the virtual
Mindspace but only a small part (one world) becomes physical and which
part is physical also is written there.
I cannot say much about the actual recording mechanism. It appears
that the flux that compactifies 6 space dimensions (and is also
somewhat like eigenfunctions if not actually)------ that the flux is
part of the computation process. The flux may even be what
consciousness is made out of. Anyway the results of computation
determines the configuration of the flux.
The flux BTW is a higher- order kind of EM flux. As I said in the
paper, only flux and dimension seem to be fundamental to string
theory, and dimension can be computed. So maybe flux (or
consciousness) is fundamental. During the Big Bang the flux creates a
number system out of Calabi-Yau compact manifolds, which in turn makes
mathematics from the natural numbers, which in turn makes mind and
matter.
Consciousness->Math->Mind->Matter->Life
Using Church's thesis we get the more verifiable statement:
math -> arithmetic -> computations -> mind -> matter -> life
We can test it by comparing the empirical matter with the matter
appearing from logical reason in the consequences sum up here.
Bruno
After all most eastern religions say that consciousness is where
everything comes from.
Yes, indeed, as the Japanese
expression goes: "To a hammer, everything in >the world looks like
a nail."
But it would be helpful to see the How of the >Recording might
physically
occur?
It does not happen physically. The recording of everything that will
or has happened is in the virtual mindspace
Are Leibniz's monads emerging from a virtual >space, a phase space, a
Platonian great beyond?
They exist in a singular physical space (like the non-zero volume of a
black hole singularity) as 9 uniform, orthogonal space dimensions, 3
of which inflate as 6 dimnesions curl up into the CY particles or
monads during the Big Bang.
Are these monads conscious, semi->consciousness
waiting a brain to actualize them?
I did not write about that in the paper, but each monad appears to see
or sense every other monad in the universe instantly. So they have
extreme awareness, something the Buddhists attribute to Indra's
jeweles.
The monads compute the brain. The monads actualize everything
physical.
It sounds also like not only Tegmark, but
Beckenstein, with the Beckenstein Bound (1 x 10^120).
I believe the Lloyd limit is the same as the Bekenstein-Hawking Bound
for a black hole S=kA/4 where A is the surface area of the black hole.
The number you quote is the result if you use for A the area of the
observable universe. Then it's called the Lloyd limit.
How could or does
intelligence make use of this aspect of the universe, if it at all
can?
I would say that the computations that the monads are capable of are
intelligent when the resources (comp power) required are within that
bound; and the conjecture is that consciousness emerges when the
required comp power in bits of information exceed that bound (not to
be confused with the speculation above that flux is consciousness)
Its
a bit like Stephen Wolfram thinking, he can re->create the
knowledge of
unknown extra-terrrestial life, if we, but merely, >compute it
properly, and
extract the useful data. Wolfram has not >spoken at all on this,
since he
made his conjecture over ten years ago. Perhpas it was a bit of
flipancy on
his part?
Like I said in the paper, Tegmark was not the first one with a math
ToE but perhaps the most famous. I did not know about Wolfram's
statement. I bet that such thinking goes way back to Pythagoras. I
agree that Pythagoras is more famous than Tegmark.
I sent the paper to Tegmark last week but have not heard back. He may
have thrown it into the crack pot.
Richard
Very good paper(s) at your site, indeed. Thanks.
The second paper down speaks more about the recording process and
motivates the 14/12 dimension split between the Metaverse and the
universe.
Thanks for the kudos
Richard
-Mitch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an
email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-
l...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
