On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:56 AM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> See the actual paper:
That's not the same paper and as far as I can tell Catherine McGeoch had
nothing to do with it. And the paper you refer to is about a 108 qbit
computer but these new results are for a 439 qbit computer. This was just a
announcement, the actual paper about these new results won't be available
till Wednesday. It's true that these results have not yet been published
in a peer reviewed journal but if they hold up it's huge. The fact that
firms like Google and Lockheed have payed good money for earlier versions
of D Wave's machines gives me some confidence that it's not just hot air.
John K Clark
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.