I know I shouldn't be flattered to hear that Max Born's great grandson
endorses my view of quantum probability, but.........

:D  :D  :D

On 12 October 2013 00:11, Pierz <pier...@gmail.com> wrote:

> That is pretty much exactly my understanding. It does puzzle me that this
> argument about the supposed probability problem with MWI is still live,
> when that explanation seems perfectly coherent.
> On Friday, October 11, 2013 10:04:40 PM UTC+11, Liz R wrote:
>> If you subdivide a continuum, I assume you can do so in a way that gives
>> the required probabilities. For example if the part of the multiverse that
>> is involved in performing a quantum measurement with a 50-50 chance of
>> either outcome is represented by the numbers 0 to 1, you can divide those
>> into 0-0.5 and 0.5 to 1. Doesn't David do something like this in FOR? (Or
>> is this too simplistic?)

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to