I know I shouldn't be flattered to hear that Max Born's great grandson endorses my view of quantum probability, but.........
:D :D :D On 12 October 2013 00:11, Pierz <[email protected]> wrote: > That is pretty much exactly my understanding. It does puzzle me that this > argument about the supposed probability problem with MWI is still live, > when that explanation seems perfectly coherent. > > On Friday, October 11, 2013 10:04:40 PM UTC+11, Liz R wrote: >> >> If you subdivide a continuum, I assume you can do so in a way that gives >> the required probabilities. For example if the part of the multiverse that >> is involved in performing a quantum measurement with a 50-50 chance of >> either outcome is represented by the numbers 0 to 1, you can divide those >> into 0-0.5 and 0.5 to 1. Doesn't David do something like this in FOR? (Or >> is this too simplistic?) >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
