On 14 Nov 2013, at 04:47, meekerdb wrote:
On 11/13/2013 7:26 PM, LizR wrote:
On 14 November 2013 16:18, Chris de Morsella
<[email protected]> wrote:
But as Telmo points out we can't just wait till fossil fuel runs
out and then switch. It takes energy to build nuclear power plants
and solar panels and wind tubines. In principle they could
bootstrap themselves, but not on the time scale we need to make the
transition.
Who's suggesting we wait and then switch?
A lot of the FUD campaign is to say the science is uncertain; we
need to wait until we're sure.
That's why it would help if people understand that science, by its
very nature, is uncertain, and so "being uncertain" is NOT a reason
for not taking decision.
The use of science by government of science is of the type of pseudo-
religion abuse.
Bruno
We can't take action that will have negative economic effects on the
basis of imperfect climate models.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.