On 21 Nov 2013, at 11:05, Telmo Menezes wrote:

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:

On 20 Nov 2013, at 21:35, John Mikes wrote:

Telmo wrote:

"I admire the US constitution too. In fact, my political position is
essentially to follow it (although I like to imagine possibilities for
peaceful world with further increases in freedom)."

Which Constitution? the one epoch-opening chef-d'oeuvre based on modernized medieval ideas of those well educated smoking-duelling slave-owner male
chauvinist Forefathers,
who just did not want to pay taxes to the King of England, or the later
"amended" versions of the same obsolete construct making it into a
gun-toting killer - corrupt, faith-ruled money-monger (with SOME exceptions,
thank you).

I join you in admiring the original one - as a relic, an innovation
historical masterpiece FOR THE 18th CENTURY. Not for the 21st.
My admiration stopped short when I realized the outcome:
a 'special-interest money'-ruled anti-democratic conglomerate, governing a so called government into committing crimes (international and domestic)
originally excluded
from it's 'modus (regulatio) vivendi'.

How can you imagine a 'peaceful' world with capitalistic (I call it:
econo-feudalistic) principles, imperialistic (oil?) wars and forcing own
interest on other countries? (Not to
mention the availability of all level governance for enough money).



Gödel pretended that the US constitution was inconsistent and refused to
sign it.

You mean "pretended" in the French sense right? As in Gödel claimed that...

Oops! Yes. Thanks for noticing. "To pretend" is a false friend. I knew it, but forget it all the time!



Einstein intervened and succeeded in changing Gödel's mind (about
not signing it to get the "green card" or the nationality).
Einstein asked Gödel if the US constitution could prevent something like a Nazy party to take power, like in Germany, and Gödel said that it could!

Provided it is followed, of course. I don't think the Weimar
constitution was ever repealed during the third reich. It was simply
ignored...

OK.



I don't think capitalism is the problem, but financial lobbying and
corporatism; + lies, can pervert completely a democracy.

I completely agree. We might only differ in that you are more
optimistic on the possibility of preventing financial lobbying using
rules, while I suspect that the only solution is to decentralise power
so completely that there is not target to lobby.

I am not sure decentralizing would work better. It would augment the number of local powers, and such local powers might even been worse, as being more local and less public or less transparent. I think we might need some reasonable mix of centralized and decentralized power. If nobody complains on his local decentralized power, the central power should have nothing to say, but if the locals complain about their local powers, the central power can be used as an arbiter.




The deeper problem relies in the fact that most humans are unwilling to think by themselves, and they confuse "p -> q" and "q -> p" all the times.
The (human, but not only) sciences are still driven by the appeal to
authority. We have never been "modern".

I'm happy to read this. I thought this confusion was a central problem
in society for a long time, without being an expert in logic.

The problem is that "p <-> q" is far better than nothing, in the short run, so our brains are hardwired to "reason" by association, instead, of logical validity. Logic is by essence counter-intuitive (which explains the logician's sense of humor). The short term/long term conflict is unavoidable. Humans face it all the time, like when hesitating to stop smoking, or to stop producing CO2, etc. It is even more complex today due to globalization. With the 20th century, earth has become a finite space, and this has to be taken into account, and it is not a simple task, as we have to change habits that we have since a very long time. In the long run, we will have to escape the planet and continue to run forward. But meanwhile, we have to accommodate with the finite resourcing, with or without global warming. That's a reason more to fight against corporatism, special private interests, international white collar criminality, etc.

Bruno




Telmo.

Bruno


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything- l...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to