On 28 December 2013 23:46, Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2013/12/28 LizR <[email protected]> > >> On 28 December 2013 08:23, Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Non existence can not exist. but non existence is not the same than >>> nothing. Nothing can exist . it is not the same than non existence because >>> something exist: nothing. therefore the question why there are things >>> different than nothing, (that is, something) instead of nothing (that is >>> the most simple kind of existence)? >>> >>> We're here because we're here because we're here because we're here? >> >> That is another way to put the argument of those that say "non existence > can not exist" therefore something must exist, from which everything > derives, including us. But that is a non sequitur (it does not follow) > My point, too, I just couldn't think how to put it, so I temporised. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
