On 28 December 2013 23:46, Alberto G. Corona <agocor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/12/28 LizR <lizj...@gmail.com>
>> On 28 December 2013 08:23, Alberto G. Corona <agocor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Non existence can not exist. but non existence is not the same than
>>> nothing. Nothing can exist . it is not the same than non existence because
>>> something exist: nothing. therefore the question why there are things
>>> different than nothing, (that is, something) instead of nothing (that is
>>> the most simple kind of existence)?
>>> We're here because we're here because we're here because we're here?
>> That is another way to put the argument of those that say "non existence
> can not exist" therefore something must exist, from which everything
> derives, including us. But that is a non sequitur (it does not follow)
My point, too, I just couldn't think how to put it, so I temporised.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.