On 7 January 2014 05:16, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 4:11 PM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 6 January 2014 06:47, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Bell's theorem holds only under a certain set of assumptions, >>>> >>> >>> >>True. As I've said many times Bell made exactly 3 assumptions: >>> 1) High School algebra and trigonometry works. >>> 2) Things are local. >>> 3) Things are realistic. >>> >> >> > In fact Bell made a fourth assumption, although he didn't realise he >> was making it until later. Namely, he assumed that time is asymmetric. >> > > I won't bother to argue if Bell made this assumption or not because it > doesn't matter, time is asymmetric. >
Not in a manner that affects EPR experiments. Show me an EPR experiment that involves neutral kaon decay and you will have a point, otherwise this is simply not true. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
