On 15 January 2014 05:33, John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Jesse Mazer <laserma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We know better than to think classical physics represents an exact
>> description of our universe, but it certainly describes a logically
>> possible mathematical universe
> Maybe but we don't know that with certainty, if we ever find a Theory of
> Everything we might find that classical physics is logically self
We already know that it may contain singularities, which could be
considered at least physically problematical if not downright logically
inconsistent (especially by people who don't think anything real can be
infinite). Of course GR fails on that basis too.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.