On 16 Jan 2014, at 00:12, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
All,
I want to try to state my model of how spacetime is created by
quantum events more clearly and succinctly.
Begin by Imagining a world in which everything is computational.
That does not exist. If everything is computational, I am
computational, and thus comp is true, but comp entails the existence
of many non computational things, so everything cannot be a
computational things. You seem to ignore the FPI, and you seem to use
implicitly some body/mind identify thesis which are not consistent
with computationalism.
Bruno
In particular where the usually imagined single pre-existing
dimensional spacetime background does NOT exist.
Now consider how we can get a spacetime to emerge from the
computations in a way that conceptually unifies GR and QM,
eliminates all quantum 'paradoxes', and explains the source of
quantum randomness in the world.
There is an easy straightforward way though it takes a little effort
to understand, and one must first set aside some common sense
notions about reality.
Assume a basic computation that occurs is the conservation of
particle properties in any particle interaction in comp space.
The conservation of particle properties essentially takes the
amounts of all particle properties of incoming particles and
redistributes them among the outgoing particles in every particle
interaction.
The results of such computational events is that the particle
properties of all outgoing particles of every event are
interrelated. They have to be to be conserved in toto. This is
called 'entanglement'. The outgoing particles of every event are
always entangled on the particle properties conserved in that event.
Now some particle properties (spin, mass, energy) are dimensional
particle properties. These are entangled too by particle interaction
events. In other words, all dimensional particle properties between
the outgoing particles of every event are interrelated. They have to
be for them to be conserved. These relationships are exact. They
must be to satisfy the conservation laws.
Now assume every such dimensional entanglement effectively creates a
spacetime point, defined as a dimensional interrelationship.
Now assume those particles keep interacting with other particles.
The result will be an ever expanding network of dimensional
interrelationships which in effect creates a mini spacetime manifold
of dimensional interrelations.
Now assume a human observer at the classical level which is
continuously involved in myriads of particle interaction (e.g.
millions of photons impinging on its retina). The effect will be
that all those continuous particle events will result in a vast
network of dimensional interrelationships that is perceived by the
human observer as a classical spacetime.
He cannot observe any actual empty space because it doesn't actually
exist. All that he can actually observe is actual events with
dimensional relationships to him. Now the structure that emerges,
due to the math of the particle property conservation laws in
aggregate, is consistent and manifests at the classical level as the
structure of our familiar spacetime.
But this, like all aspects of the classical 'physical' world, is
actually a computational illusion. This classical spacetime doesn't
actually exist. It must be continually maintained by myriads of
continuing quantum events or it instantly vanishes back into the
computational reality from which it emerged.
Now an absolutely critical point in understand how this model
conceptually unifies GR and QM and eliminates quantum paradox is
that every mini-spacetime network that emerges from quantum events
is absolutely independent of all others (a completely separate
space) UNTIL it is linked and aligned with other networks through
some common quantum event. When that occurs, and only then, all
alignments of both networks are resolved into a single spacetime
common to all its elements.
E.g. in the spin entanglement 'paradox'. When the particles are
created their spins are exactly equal and opposite to each other,
but only in their own frame in their own mini spacetime. They have
to be to obey the conservation laws. That is why their orientation
is unknowable to a human observer in his UNconnected spacetime frame
of the laboratory.
However when the spin of one particle is measured that event links
and aligns the mini-spacetime of the particles with the spacetime of
the laboratory and that makes the spin orientations of both
particles aligned with that of the laboratory and thereafter the
spin orientation of the other particle will always be found equal
and opposite to that of the first.
There is no FTL communication, there is no 'non-locality', there is
no 'paradox'. It all depends on the recognition that the spin
orientations of the particles exist in a completely separate
unaligned spacetime fragment from that of the laboratory until they
are linked and aligned via a measurement event.
Edgar
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 12:16:28 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
All,
I want to try to state my model of how spacetime is created by
quantum events more clearly and succinctly.
Begin by Imagining a world in which everything is computational. In
particular where the usually imagined single pre-existing
dimensional spacetime background does NOT exist.
Now consider how we can get a spacetime to emerge from the
computations in a way that conceptually unifies GR and QM,
eliminates all quantum 'paradoxes', and explains the source of
quantum randomness in the world.
There is an easy straightforward way though it takes a little effort
to understand, and one must first set aside some common sense
notions about reality.
Assume a basic computation that occurs is the conservation of
particle properties in any particle interaction in comp space.
The conservation of particle properties essentially takes the
amounts of all particle properties of incoming particles and
redistributes them among the outgoing particles in every particle
interaction.
The results of such computational events is that the particle
properties of all outgoing particles of every event are
interrelated. They have to be to be conserved in toto. This is
called 'entanglement'. The outgoing particles of every event are
always entangled on the particle properties conserved in that event.
Now some particle properties (spin, mass, energy) are dimensional
particle properties. These are entangled too by particle interaction
events. In other words, all dimensional particle properties between
the outgoing particles of every event are interrelated. They have to
be for them to be conserved. These relationships are exact. They
must be to satisfy the conservation laws.
Now assume every such dimensional entanglement effectively creates a
spacetime point, defined as a dimensional interrelationship.
Now assume those particles keep interacting with other particles.
The result will be an ever expanding network of dimensional
interrelationships which in effect creates a mini spacetime manifold
of dimensional interrelations.
Now assume a human observer at the classical level which is
continuously involved in myriads of particle interaction (e.g.
millions of photons impinging on its retina). The effect will be
that all those continuous particle events will result in a vast
network of dimensional interrelationships that is perceived by the
human observer as a classical spacetime.
He cannot observe any actual empty space because it doesn't actually
exist. All that he can actually observe is actual events with
dimensional relationships to him. Now the structure that emerges,
due to the math of the particle property conservation laws in
aggregate, is consistent and manifests at the classical level as the
structure of our familiar spacetime.
But this, like all aspects of the classical 'physical' world, is
actually a computational illusion. This classical spacetime doesn't
actually exist. It must be continually maintained by myriads of
continuing quantum events or it instantly vanishes back into the
computational reality from which it emerged.
Now an absolutely critical point in understand how this model
conceptually unifies GR and QM and eliminates quantum paradox is
that every mini-spacetime network that emerges from quantum events
is absolutely independent of all others (a completely separate
space) UNTIL it is linked and aligned with other networks through
some common quantum event. When that occurs, and only then, all
alignments of both networks are resolved into a single spacetime
common to all its elements.
E.g. in the spin entanglement 'paradox'. When the particles are
created their spins are exactly equal and opposite to each other,
but only in their own frame in their own mini spacetime. They have
to be to obey the conservation laws. That is why their orientation
is unknowable to a human observer in his UNconnected spacetime frame
of the laboratory.
However when the spin of one particle is measured that event links
and aligns the mini-spacetime of the particles with the spacetime of
the laboratory and that makes the spin orientations of both
particles aligned with that of the laboratory and thereafter the
spin orientation of the other particle will always be found equal
and opposite to that of the first.
There is no FTL communication, there is no 'non-locality', there is
no 'paradox'. It all depends on the recognition that the spin
orientations of the particles exist in a completely separate
unaligned spacetime fragment from that of the laboratory until they
are linked and aligned via a measurement event.
Edgar
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.