On 02 Feb 2014, at 02:45, meekerdb wrote:
Maybe we can convert Bruno to Aristotelanism:
https://web.math.princeton.edu/~nelson/papers/e.pdf
That can convince the inner god (the soul, S4Grz) of Brouwerism
(modern Aristotelism about that infinity question).
But the inner God is already convinced by this.
Yet, that is not enough to explore reality. It is enough to build
bombs and rocket only. To confuse what we can do potentially with
truth is a confusion between []p and []p & p.
It is again a form of solispsism, I am afraid. It can work for a large
part of math, but has no sense in the fundamental questioning.
Even Nelson himself uses often classical non standard models to
justify its predicate arithmetic and probability theory.
Nelson is very good and clear, but his philosophy abstracts from all
questions I am interested.
Bruno
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
