You just scolded John Mikes for assuming he knew what reality is. Brent
Brent: could you refresh my aging memory and 'quote me' with this stupid misunderstanding? It was last time yesterday when I wrote the opposite. I do not joke about being agnostic, especially in cases what I 'assume', like 'the existence of a reality'. I call it 'infinite complexity' and would really appreciate to learn your definition of the "finite". (Not mathematically, of course). John M On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 2:11 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/2/2014 2:38 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 02 Feb 2014, at 02:45, meekerdb wrote: > > Maybe we can convert Bruno to Aristotelanism: > > https://web.math.princeton.edu/~nelson/papers/e.pdf > > > > That can convince the inner god (the soul, S4Grz) of Brouwerism (modern > Aristotelism about that infinity question). > > But the inner God is already convinced by this. > > Yet, that is not enough to explore reality. > > > You just scolded John Mikes for assuming he knew what reality is. > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
