On 3 February 2014 23:42, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: That's hard to say. I think conscious thought will be found to a class of > thoughts and there will be degrees of consciousness and it will be > complicated and the "Hard Problem" will be seen to have been overly > simplistic. It may have an answer, like "If it can do induction or Cantor > diagonalization it's conscious.", but that may be only one kind of > consciousness and probably not the most interesting.
Maybe so, but that's still essentially about the public aspects, isn't it? I guess I'm asking if you think that, in the final analysis, any interesting categorical distinction will remain between the public behaviour that accompanies consciousness (however sophisticated the model) and the private experience of its consequences in one's own case. If such a distinction does remain, people (some of them anyway) will still no doubt feel that something has been left out of the explanation. I accept that many people even now see no need for any such distinction - I've often had trouble getting people who've never considered the matter to grasp what is meant by the HP.Do you personally simply reserve judgement, or do you tend to swing one way or the other? David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
