Liz, I did explain it in considerable detail. As usual you either aren't paying attention or things aren't registering....
Read my previous posts for the explanation.... Edgar On Sunday, February 9, 2014 2:02:25 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote: > > On 10 February 2014 07:44, Edgar L. Owen <edga...@att.net <javascript:>>wrote: > >> Jesse, >> >> No, "the definition of p-time simultaneity itself depends on the >> arbitrary "choice of coordinate system" is NOT true. I clearly stated >> otherwise and explained why. Please reread if it isn't clear. >> >> You haven't *explained *this. You have merely *stated* it. You have yet > to explain what the mapping is from p-time to any other time, or from the > p-time coordinate system to any other coordinate system. You seem to have > simply assumed this must be possible, somehow, but you can't explain how > this allows for simultaneity to be relative to an observer. You haven't > *explained* anything much. "Imagine a universe in which everything is > computational" is not an explanation, it's about at the level of exposition > in a SF novel. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
