Liz, I did explain it in considerable detail. As usual you either aren't paying attention or things aren't registering....
Read my previous posts for the explanation.... Edgar On Sunday, February 9, 2014 2:02:25 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote: > > On 10 February 2014 07:44, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected] <javascript:>>wrote: > >> Jesse, >> >> No, "the definition of p-time simultaneity itself depends on the >> arbitrary "choice of coordinate system" is NOT true. I clearly stated >> otherwise and explained why. Please reread if it isn't clear. >> >> You haven't *explained *this. You have merely *stated* it. You have yet > to explain what the mapping is from p-time to any other time, or from the > p-time coordinate system to any other coordinate system. You seem to have > simply assumed this must be possible, somehow, but you can't explain how > this allows for simultaneity to be relative to an observer. You haven't > *explained* anything much. "Imagine a universe in which everything is > computational" is not an explanation, it's about at the level of exposition > in a SF novel. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
