Well if you can store 61 times more energy, that just means there's room for improvement in the existing batteries... Good news, if nature was able to do it so can we I hope. Le 28 févr. 2014 00:50, "LizR" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On 28 February 2014 07:47, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Lithium batteries are the most energy dense batteries in use today and >> also the most expensive, they can store .72 megajoules per kilogram, >> gasoline stores 44 megajoules per kilogram; so gasoline is 61 times more >> energy dense than the best batteries and is far far far cheaper. >> > > Are you talking about the real costs here or just the cost at the pump > (which is of course subsidised massively by ignoring its environmental > effects) ? > > I mean the real cost MAY be cheaper but you have to factor in saving the > Earth... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
