On 03 Mar 2014, at 08:32, Kim Jones wrote:


On 2 Mar 2014, at 11:03 pm, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:


On 02 Mar 2014, at 11:13, Kim Jones wrote:



Kim Jones B. Mus. GDTL

On 1 Mar 2014, at 7:43 pm, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

and I chose numbers as people are familiarized with them.

Bruno

How about music? Music is just a bunch of numbers.

Well, you can't say that. Especially to a literally minded stubborn mathematician :)

I do agree that the relation between math and music are very deep and profound though.


Yes. Tell me: are the following equivalent statements to a literally- minded stubborn mathematician like you:

4 + 1 = 5

1 + 4 = 5

2 + 3 = 5

3 + 2 = 5

They are equivalent in many senses, and not equivalent in many other senses.

They are equivalent semantically, but then with classical semantics, all true statement are equivalent. I mean that if you have the truth that 4+1 = 5 then 1+4=5. That is: (4+1= 5 <-> 1+4=5) is true.

They are deductively equivalent in RA, PA, ZF, etc. because such theories can prove the equivalence above.

They are not equivalent in any procedural sense. adding 1 to 4 is not the same thing than adding 4 to 1. It happens that the result is the same, but the procedure is not.

In fact "equivalent" means nothing, if you don't stipulate the relation of equivalence applied.







because to a lateral-thinking, alternative-seeking musical thinker like moi they are not.

OK. But I need your equivalence relation.




You only have to perform (ie clap or tap out) 4 + 1 followed by 1 + 4 to see ( ie hear -> ratiocinate) that they are not equivalent in the musical sense.

OK, in the musical sense, assuming "+" introduce a time delay in the claps, they are not.



Give me  a shout if you cannot clap these sentences accurately.

Actually, your clap view of numbers make 1+x non equivalent with x+1 useful for the infinite ordinals.

1 + omega = omega

that is clap followed by clap clap clap clap ... is considered as equivalent to clap clap clap ... The "+" does not add delay, for the ordinal, unless there are an infinity, and so:

omega + 1 is not = to omega,

clap, clap, clap, clap, ...., clap ≠ clap, clap, clap, clap, ....,

That's a different rhythm indeed.

Bruno





K

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to