Eugen,
That's not that bad ...
Now I can make some sense of what you "see".
Like Craig reminds me the talk of the "universal soul", there is a
ring of "intelligible matter" and/or sensible "matter" in your
"theory" below.
Unfortunately your explanation of computation was non sensical. You
have a huge amount of study to do for learning how to design and
develop theories.
And then, if I am correct, follow the explanation and you will
understand that the universal machine has already discovered it.
(Mainly the intelligible hypostases, Bp & Dt).
On this list most people agree already on the Everett resolution of
the QM paradox, and talk on more subtle paradoxes when assuming
mechanism or digital mechanism.
We have no problem with "block time", or "No time", as the indexical
solution satisfy us (except Stephen).
Bruno
On 03 Mar 2014, at 17:18, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
Brent, et al,
I officially challenge anyone to poke any holes in my theory of how
spacetime emerges from quantum events or prove it wrong. If no one
takes me up on the challenge I'll have to assume everyone accepts it
by default.
I claim the theory
1. Resolves all quantum paradox
2. Provides a conceptual unification of QT and GR
3. Explains the necessary source of quantum randomness
This theory is at least as controversial and potentially
groundbreaking as my P-time Theory so fire away!
Here's a summary of the theory:
Begin by assuming a world in which everything is computational. In
particular where the usually single pre-existing dimensional
spacetime background does NOT exist.
Now consider how we can get a spacetime to emerge from the
computations in a way that conceptually unifies GR and QM,
eliminates all quantum 'paradoxes', and explains the source of
quantum randomness.
There is an easy straightforward way though it takes a little effort
to understand, and one must first set aside some common sense
notions about reality.
Assume a basic computation that occurs is the conservation of
particle properties in any particle interaction in computational
space.
The conservation of particle properties essentially takes the
amounts of all particle properties of incoming particles and
redistributes them among the outgoing particles in every particle
interaction.
The results of such computational events is that the particle
properties of all outgoing particles of every event are
interrelated. They have to be to be conserved in toto. This is
called 'entanglement'. The outgoing particles of every event are
always entangled on the particle properties conserved in that event.
Now some particle properties (spin, mass, energy) are dimensional
particle properties. These are entangled too by particle interaction
events. In other words, all dimensional particle properties between
the outgoing particles of every event are necessarily interrelated.
They have to be for them to be conserved. These relationships are
exact. They must be to satisfy the conservation laws.
Now assume every such dimensional entanglement effectively creates a
spacetime point, defined as a dimensional interrelationship.
Now assume those particles keep interacting with other particles.
The result will be an ever expanding network of dimensional
interrelationships which in effect creates a mini spacetime manifold
of dimensional interrelations.
Now assume a human observer at the classical level which is
continuously involved in myriads of particle interaction (e.g.
millions of photons impinging on its retina). The effect will be
that all those continuous particle events will result in a vast
network of dimensional interrelationships that is perceived by the
human observer as a classical spacetime.
He cannot observe any actual empty space because it doesn't actually
exist. All that he can actually observe is actual events with
dimensional relationships to him. Now the structure that emerges,
due to the math of the particle property conservation laws in
aggregate, is consistent and manifests at the classical level as the
structure of our familiar spacetime.
But this, like all aspects of the classical 'physical' world, is
actually a computational illusion. This classical spacetime doesn't
actually exist. It must be continually maintained by myriads of
continuing quantum events or it instantly vanishes back into the
computational reality from which it emerged.
Now an absolutely critical point in understand how this model
conceptually unifies GR and QM and eliminates quantum paradox is
that every mini-spacetime network that emerges from quantum events
is absolutely independent of all others (a completely separate
fragmentary partial space) UNTIL it is linked and aligned with other
networks through some common quantum event. When that occurs, and
only then, all alignments of both networks are resolved into a
single spacetime common to all its elements.
E.g. in the spin entanglement 'paradox'. When the particles are
created their spins are exactly equal and opposite to each other,
but only in their own frame in their own mini spacetime. They have
to be to obey the conservation laws. That is why their orientation
is unknowable to a human observer in his as yet UNconnected
spacetime frame of the laboratory.
However when the spin of one particle is measured that event links
and aligns the mini-spacetime of the particles with the spacetime of
the laboratory and that makes the spin orientations of both
particles aligned with that of the laboratory and thereafter the
spin orientation of the other particle will always be found equal
and opposite to that of the first.
Thus there is no FTL communication, there is no 'non-locality',
there is no 'paradox'. It all depends on the recognition that the
spin orientations of the particles exist in a completely separate
unaligned spacetime fragment from that of the laboratory until they
are linked and aligned via a measurement event.
Edgar
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
