Brent, could you please reply to Edgar? He is, I'm sure, eagerly awaiting your response so he can unleash a torrent of carefully thought out arguments which will cover every point you've made. (As indeed am I.)
On 1 March 2014 13:46, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > Brent, > > Are you addressing that question to me? You are responding to a post by > Liz talking about "your" theory. If so I'll be glad to answer. > On Friday, February 28, 2014 6:14:42 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > On 2/28/2014 2:43 PM, LizR wrote: >> >> If anyone is looking for the source of quantum randomness I've already >>> provided an explanation. It occurs as fragmentary spacetimes are created by >>> quantum events and then merged via shared quantum events. There can be no >>> deterministic rules for aligning separate spacetime fragments thus nature >>> is forced to make those alignments randomly. >>> >> >> OK, I'll bite. Show us the maths and the experts can see how it stacks >> up against Everett et al. >> >>> >>> But sadly no one on this group is interested in quantum theory, only >>> relativity, and far out philosophies such as 'comp'. >>> >> >> On the contrary, I am interested in your theory of quantum randomness IF >> you can flesh it out. For example how do you describe a Stern-Gerlach >> experiment, a Vaidman no-interaction measurment, an EPR experiment, >> Bose-Einstein condensate,...? >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
