> On 26 Mar 2014, at 1:46 pm, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/25/2014 6:50 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 26 March 2014 12:45, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On 3/25/2014 6:34 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 26 March 2014 12:15, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> An infinite universe (Tegmark type 1) implies that our consciousness 
>>>>>>> flits about from one copy of us to another and that as a consequence we 
>>>>>>> are immortal, so it does affect us even if there is no physical 
>>>>>>> communication between its distant parts.
>>>>> 
>>>>> That seems to imply that one's consciousness is unique and moves around 
>>>>> like a soul. 
>>>> 
>>>> There's no dodgy metaphysical mechanism involved. If there are multiple 
>>>> physical copies of you, and each copy has a similar consciousness to you, 
>>>> then you can't know which copy is currently generating your consciousness.
>>>>  
>>>>> I think the idea is that the "stream of consciousness" is unified so long 
>>>>> as all the copies are being realized identically, in fact they are not    
>>>>>                              "multiple" per Leibniz's identity of 
>>>>> indiscernibles.  When there is some quantum event amplified enough to 
>>>>> make a difference in the stream of consciousness then the stream divides 
>>>>> and there are two (or more) streams.
>>>> 
>>>> An implication of this is that if one of the streams terminates your 
>>>> consciousness will continue in the other.
>>> 
>>> But it will, at best be *similar* to the deceased "you", just as I am quite 
>>> different from Brent Meeker of 50yrs ago.  And there is no quarantee that 
>>> some stream will continue.
>> 
>> Similar is good enough. There is a guarantee that some branch will continue 
>> if everything that can happen does happen.
> 
> That's a to casual reading of "can happen" there are many things in quantum 
> mechanics that can't happen.  Just because we can imagine something 
> happening, it doesn't follow that it is nomologically possible.

What sorts of things that might conceivably save your life do you think are not 
nomologically possible?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to