On 1 April 2014 13:56, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/31/2014 6:41 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote: > > Are you saying that the fact that we don't see many worlds is >> evidence against many worlds? >> >> >> No, the fact that whatever our instrument reads our *theory* says there >> are infinitely many other readings. >> > > Is that just a psychological problem or do you think it implies the > theory is wrong? If the theory were right, what should we expect to see? > > > > No, I think it implies the theory is incomplete. It needs to explain why > our instrument readings seem to obey the laws of probability. >
Yes, it has been said many times that there is a problem with probability in an infinite universe but I assume this is not enough to conclude that an infinite universe is impossible a priori, so what *should* we observe in a such a universe? -- Stathis Papaioannou -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
