Eek! Am I a mystical many-worlder (on days that don't have a "T" in them) ?
Thank you that was very interesting, although I still don't know what to make of quantum theory (that's good, right?) By the way I've seen "Kirk on a rock" before somewhere, maybe it was in a parallel universe... On 2 April 2014 14:43, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote: > On 4/1/2014 2:25 PM, LizR wrote: > >> I just read the definition of Gleason's theorem on Wikipedia and now my >> brain is full. A "for-dummies" version would be appreciated... >> > > I think what Gleason proved is that the only consistent probability > measure on a Hilbert space is given by the normalized inner product. But > it's not clear that there is a probability measure on the MW. > > http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/20802/why-is- > gleasons-theorem-not-enough-to-obtain-born-rule-in-many-worlds-interpret > > Brent > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
