Eek! Am I a mystical many-worlder (on days that don't have a "T" in them) ?
Thank you that was very interesting, although I still don't know what to make of quantum theory (that's good, right?) By the way I've seen "Kirk on a rock" before somewhere, maybe it was in a parallel universe... On 2 April 2014 14:43, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/1/2014 2:25 PM, LizR wrote: > >> I just read the definition of Gleason's theorem on Wikipedia and now my >> brain is full. A "for-dummies" version would be appreciated... >> > > I think what Gleason proved is that the only consistent probability > measure on a Hilbert space is given by the normalized inner product. But > it's not clear that there is a probability measure on the MW. > > http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/20802/why-is- > gleasons-theorem-not-enough-to-obtain-born-rule-in-many-worlds-interpret > > Brent > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
