I would like to read those papers but haven't had time yet.

On 23 April 2014 04:00, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 22 Apr 2014, at 02:03, Pierz wrote:
>
> Just came across this presentation:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEaecUuEqfc
>
> It's a bit long, but I'd be interested to hear anyone's thoughts who is
> knowledgeable on QM. I don't follow the maths, but I kind of got the gist.
> What intrigued me was his interpretation of QM and I'm wondering if anyone
> can throw any more light on it. He makes a lot of jumps which are obviously
> clear in his mind but hard to follow. He says that MWI is supportable by
> the maths, but that he prefers a "zero universes" interpretation, according
> to which we are classical simulations in a quantum computer. I'm not sure I
> follow this. I mean, I can follow the idea of being a classical simulation
> in a quantum computer, but I can't see how this is different from MWI,
> except by the manoeuvre of declaring other universes to be unreal because
> they can never practically interact with 'our' branch. I guess what
> interested me was the possibility of a coherent alternative to MWI (because
> frankly MWI scares the willies out of me),
>
>
> Me too. But at some deeper level my open-mindedness on this is
>  "protected" by an even bigger fear: the fear to get it wrong.
>
>
> but in spite of what he said, I couldn't see what it was...
>
>
> Physicists are unclear on what they mean by "world". I agree with you: to
> be a classical emulation in a quantum computer is basically equivalent with
> the MWI, assuming computationalism and a level above the quantum level.
>
> Computationalism can be ontologically simpler, as all there is needed is
> the number 0, and its successors, s(0), s(s(0)), ... and nothing else. (the
> dreams will emerge from the additive-multiplicative relations).
>
> This is automatically a 0 worlds a priori. But sharable dreams can cohere
> enough to make open the question if we are in a complete (in some sense)
> physical reality (one universe), or one multiverse, or a cluster of
> multiverses, etc. But this is only from inside, because from "outside", all
> what exists are the piece of dreams which cohere (enough or not).
>
> Here "dream" means "computation from some point of view".
>
> That is what is translated in arithmetic by "sigma_1" and provable by a
> machine ("me" in 3p), in a consistent environment, that is "[]p & <>t",
> with p an arithmetical sigma_1 sentence. (+ the "theaetetus nuance: []p &
> <>t & p).
>
> Is there a consolation for the MWI fears?
>
> Well "MWI" is not the explanation, it is the whole "theology" which is the
> explanation, and things are complex there, especially after 1500 years of
> "no mind change" on this. You might really read Plato, neoplatonists, the
> mystics, and study the comparison with some eastern school, ... and with
> actual machine's self-reference.
>
> Bruno
>
> *Life, what is it, but a dream. (*Lewis Carroll*)*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to