On 7 May 2014 21:42, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > We all have to stick on traditional empirical test. Comp is no exception, > I hope you understood this. >
Yes, sorry, I wasn't being very clear there. Of course all theories have to be tested empirically. I meant that I have to discuss the theory in terms of materialist types of experiments - as for example one might discuss whether the Higgs boson has been found, given certain experimental results (rather than whether physics can be derived from consciousness). Also I felt a bit embarassed because I did make a decision not to mention comp, because I don't yet feel qualified to discuss any other theories in terms of comp. And I felt that I was letting you down by being in that position. (The stuff about the day of the month etc is just a joke of course, which I how I cover up feeling embarassed or uncertain.) > > If the tronnies don't replicate Aspect experiment, like QM and comp, then > the tronnies theory is refuted (at least in the local usual sense). > > So comp replicates the Aspect experiment? That's very interesting. I started watching your video tonight, and of course I have read your recent physics post but I got lost. I will come back with questions... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
