Each proton includes one neutrino entron. The neutrino entron has a diameter of 0.9339 X 10-18 m. The diameter of a neutrino photon is 911 times larger at 0.851 X 10-15. An entron is two tronnies traveling in a circle at 1.57 times the speed of light (pi/2)(c). A photon is an entron traveling in a circle at twice the speed of light and forward at the speed of light. The diameter of the photon circle is 911 times the entron circle for all photons.) It would help if some of you would get a copy of my book.
In the entron the tronnie, traveling at pi/2)(c), arrives at the opposite side of the circle at the same time its Coulomb force, traveling at c, arrives there. In the photon the entron with its two circling tronnies must travel at 2c in order for both tronnies to stay ahead of their own Coulomb force. But the entron travels forward at only c so as to not outrun its Coulomb forces. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Russell Standish Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 7:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: TRONNIES On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 06:31:08PM -0700, John Ross wrote: > My theory does not include the neutrino. Do you mean: a) hasn't been extended to describe neutrinos, or b) predicts that neutrinos do not exist > It does include neutrino photons > which have the same structure as all photons. But it has an energy of > 928 MeV and a corresponding mass almost equal to the mass of the > proton. Photons normally have a lepton number of zero. > Its > entron (one plus tronnie and one minus tronnie) is one half the size > of an electron at about 1 X 10-18 m. As well as the 2 positrons and one electron, does the proton contain a "neutrino photon" or an "entron"? > Protons are destroyed in Black Holes with the release of their > neutrino entrons which escape the Black Hole to provide the gravity of > the galaxy surrounding the Black Hole. Most neutrino photons, like > the theoretical neutrino, What is the distinction between a "theoretical neutrino" and the emprically observed one? > pass through stars and planets. > The charges in the stars and planets do not feel the Coulomb forces > of the neutrino photon until after the neutrino photon has passed the > charges so the stars and planets are accelerated in the direction of > the source of the neutrino photons (i.e. the Black hole). This is gravity. > > My theory does not, at least yet, deal with lepton numbers. > Looks like it needs to. Conservation of lepton number is an empirically observed phenomenon that gives a very long-lived stability to the proton. Current observations put the half life of the proton at more than 10^{33} years. Without conservation of lepton number, protons would decay very quickly, and we wouldn't be around to have this discussion. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected] University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au Latest project: The Amoeba's Secret (http://www.hpcoders.com.au/AmoebasSecret.html) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
