On 11 May 2014 07:07, John Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > Tronnies are point particles. They have no mass. The tronnie’s only > property is its charge of plus or minus e. Its charge of e means that it > is continually producing Coulomb force waves that travel at the speed of > light. It repels itself with its own Coulomb force waves. Thus, its > minimum speed is c. However it always (or at least almost always) Is > traveling in a circle with at least one other tronnie at c(pi)/2. Although > the tronnie has no mass, when it is traveling in a circle with another > tronnie, the two tronnies are each repelling themselves and attracting each > other. This means the two tronnies together can resist an outside force. > This is the definition of mass. > > > > I show in my book that if you integrate the Coulomb forces acting in the > entron around the circumference of the entron’s circle the integrated force > turns out to be in units or joules (rather than newtons) which we can > convert to mass. This is also why the electron has mass even though it is > comprised of three tronnies each of which separately has no mass. Our > Universe has a lot of mass even though it is made entirely of nothing but > tronnies and things made from tronnies. > > > > If you think all of this sounds strange, let me see you explain > singularities. My model does not require singularities or a lot of the > other strange things required by the Standard Model. > > > Are singularities required by the SM? I thought they arose from GR?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
