On 15 May 2014, at 04:26, Dennis Ochei wrote:

G*, G, arithmetical hypostases, PA, ZF?

I must not know the lingo round here

In your answer to Liz, you show that you know what ZF (and ZFC) are, and what PA is.

G and G* are the sound and complete modal logic describing the behavior of the provability predicate of PA (described in PA), or in ZF, or actually in any arithmetical sound machine.

G described the logic of provability that the machine can prove, and G* described the true logic of provability.

For example, take consistency (~[]f = non provable false). G* proves both ~[]f, and ~[]f -> ~[](~[]f) (Gödel second incompleteness theorem), but G proves only ~[]f -> ~[](~[]f), as PA or ZF cannot prove their consistency.


To see the link with "open individualism" you might read my paper (or any more recent one):

 http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHALAbstract.html

I show that if we take seriously the idea that we are digitalizable machine, then eventually physics is a phenomenological reality emerging from the machine's dream in arithmetic (or any Turing universal theory). Then G and G* are used to find the coherence condition explaining the quantization of arithmetic, and where the quantum laws come from. You need to understand that your consciousness is not a product of your body, but more of the infinite relative bodies (self-representations) that you have in the arithmetical reality.

This eventually forces us to backtrack on Plato's and the mystics' conception of reality, instead of the current naturalism/materialism of Aristotle.

Bruno


On Wednesday, May 14, 2014, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

On 14 May 2014, at 06:05, Dennis Ochei wrote:

Under Daniel Kolak's open individualism there exists one numerically distinct person who is everyone at all times. What I want to explore is the implications of this theory for a self interested individual. For those unfamiliar with Open Individualism, you might instead imagine a demon appears to you, and informs you that after you die you will experience what it is like to be every person that ever lived.


I think that is consitent, and perhaps true with comp, but perhaps not communicable, so, like many good religious idea, to present them can be too much, and prevent people to discover that by themselves.

It would be a proposition belonging to G* minus G. What can be justified, is that if comp is true then it follows.


The only rational course of action seems to be to maximize utility across lives. Meaning if $1 will buy you in your current life 1 unit of utility, but would afford another person 10 units, it would be rationally self interested to donate the money, if you expect to experience what they shall experience. This is essentially Singer's Effective Altruism at work. Are there any other rational courses of action if Open Individualism is true (or if the hypothetical demon appeared) and one is self interested?


When amoebas does that, it gives mold, mixomycete.

I am not sure, because it depends what people do with the money, and with the short term, middle term, long term conflicts.

Social amoebas lives a selfish life until they starve, and then they make sacrifice and assure the next generations:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5h8WOWEqP6o

"We are all the same person" is close to spoiling the end of the movie, somehow.

And which "we"? I assume you take all living creatures in arithmetic from the jumping spider to "divinities" (non computable sets, oracles).

But OK, the arithmetical hypostases describes an abstract ideally correct machines instanciated into its infinitely many variants or extensions. It is a universal person. But with different beliefs and experiences, and that has its role too.

It is a process of recognition. I recognize myself in PA and ZF, in some sense.

Bruno



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to everything- [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/S5Qi3Q_2TTI/unsubscribe . To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to [email protected] .
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
Sent from Gmail Mobile

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to