On 16 May 2014 17:14, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/15/2014 10:04 PM, freqflyer07281972 wrote: > > So do you think there is some merit in Kauffman's conclusions? Do you > think it is possible to reason about "the Void"? Or meaningful? Or useful? > > > Sure, it's possible to reason about anything. Whether you can arrive at > something useful is an open question - one can but try. I like the late > Norm Levitt's remark, "What is there? EVERYTHING! So what isn't there? > NOTHING!" >
Or one could paraphrase Russell Standish - What is there? NOTHING! - Which is EVERYTHING! I like Russell's version, which creates more of a *frisson*. Although I assume Levitt is claiming the existence of a multiverse (EVERYTHING implies that of course). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
