After reading lots of repeats by otherwise smart people on the topic: do we have a concensus on this list (narrow target enough?) about some identification of * intelligence? * (forget Wiki!)
I proposed the* 'inter-lego'* classic, meaning to *"read"* (=understand act out, apply, etc.) the meanings BETWEEN the exactly worded lines (not as exactly spelled out verbatim). It requires a WIDER view, some anticipatory talent maybe, some combinatorical capability and so on). There was not too much appreciation (indeed: no reflections at all). On *'artificial'* I have a weaker opinion: in our usage of language the word directs my mind towards *'speculative'* - as both man-confounded, or contraption-erected results - or both. (I wonder why 'my mind' does avert from the* 'naturally grown'* as artificial? Indeed Mme.Nature is also just human. Or so we think. Maybe I would lose my agnostic wisdom (ha ha) of unknowable and unfathomable pressures directing the *CHANGE* in the world). So: are we ready to vote for 'intelligence'? (Not the CIA, mind you!). John M -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
