On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suggest to define God by "either the physical universe OR what is at > the origin of the physical universe, > Then if modern cosmologists are even close to being correct God is not omniscient, God isn't even very smart, in fact God is as dumb as a sack full of doorknobs. And that is a great example of someone more than willing to abandon the idea of God but not the English word G-O-D. > or what is at the origin of the conscious belief in the physical universe > Then my brain is God but your brain is not because I believe in a physical universe but you have said on this list that you don't. > With that definition of God, God's existence is quite plausible > If you redefine dragons as the animals the run in the Kentucky Derby Race every year then the existence of dragons is quite plausible. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
