On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I ask myself who would INSIST on using the word "God" (and not some >> other word) >> > > > Which one? I have suggested an other word, like the ONE, but you did not > reply. > If the "ONE" is supposed to mean the reason there is something rather than nothing it might be confusing if it turns out, and it could, that there is more than one thing responsible for that; it is also possible that the "ONE" is equal to zero because nothing is responsible for it. But if I did agree and thus freed up the word "God" for what nearly everybody on the planet already means by it would you also write a post to this list, also in all capital letters, saying "THERE IS NO GOD"? I don't think you could ever bring yourself to type that because you love the word G-O-D too much. > That is the key things in most neoplatonist theologies: God is not even a > being. It does not exist as an object, nor a phenomenon. With simple logic, > it cannot be omniscient, > Forget omniscient, if Cosmologists are even close to being correct "God", the reason there is something rather than nothing, is not even as intelligent as a worm and has less memory than one; and I would maintain that virtually nobody means that when they use the word "God", not even you except when you're arguing on this list about religion with me. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
